UserBenchmark – the reward that retains on giving! The web site’s newest evaluate of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has left many in shock because it now deems spending further on a gaming CPU pointless. Persevering with its unending saga of denouncing AMD, which it typically refers to as “Superior Advertising and marketing Units,” UserBenchmark doubles down and names the i5-13600K and i5-14600K as worthy opponents, although AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D has dethroned Intel’s quickest gaming CPU, the i9-14900K, by virtually 33% per our testing.
This isn’t the primary time we have encountered such an ‘intriguing’ take from UserBenchmark. The web site has been in sizzling water for rating the i3-8100 increased than the i9-9980XE merely primarily based on clock speeds — make that make sense. A fast take a look at its CPU rating chart primarily based on efficiency from highest to lowest places the Ryzen 7 9800X3D on the twelfth spot, trailed by the “3D joker” Ryzen 9 7950X3D on the twenty fifth place. The Ryzen 9 9950X follows go well with, touchdown within the twenty eighth place. Regardless of the way you take a look at it – whether or not it’s gaming, productiveness, or effectivity – fans overwhelmingly suppose these numbers merely do not add up.
Shifting over to their precise evaluate, it does not take an knowledgeable to discern reality from fiction. UserBenchmark asserts that the X3D design leads to a 6% deduction in clock speeds however fails to deal with AMD’s redesign of the stacking hierarchy, which helps cut back the impression of this clock velocity deficit, even in single-core situations. Higher but, the 9800X3D can sustain with the non-X3D 9700X in lots of manufacturing workloads.
The positioning additional states that “AMD is trying to drive demand by way of aggressive advertising and marketing reasonably than delivering real-world efficiency,” although the 9800X3D at the moment unanimously stands because the world’s quickest gaming CPU – beating Intel’s Core Extremely 9 285K by virtually 40%. UserBenchmark then suggests customers select the i5-13600K/14600K since spending greater than $200 on gaming CPUs is “pointless,” however that may be a purely subjective assertion. As well as, the precise efficiency, effectivity, and platform variations between the i5-14600K and the 9800X3D are components UserBenchmark did not take into account.
UserBenchmark’s complete argument pivots across the proposition that quicker CPUs are “pointless” for gaming. It’s the similar as saying that you just should not get something quicker than an RTX 3050 for the reason that human eye clearly cannot see previous 60 FPS – sarcasm meant. For sure, fans are having a discipline day with this evaluate.
